Prediction of Irene Peacock vs Cilly Aussem Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

I. Peacock vs C. Aussem

Irene Peacock
Irene Peacock

Flag IND IND

w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
Cilly Aussem
Cilly Aussem

Flag GER GER

w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

133
Age
116
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Peacock 1 - 0 Aussem

They have played 3 sets in total, with Irene Peacock winning 2 and Cilly Aussem winning 1. The last match between Irene Peacock and Cilly Aussem was at the French Championships, 24-05-1927, Round: , Surface: Clay, with Irene Peacock getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Peacock1
Aussem0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(French Championships(05-24-27)

Clay
IND Flag
Irene Peacock
4
6
6
GER Flag
Cilly Aussem
6
2
4

I. Peacock vs C. Aussem H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
80.83% (156-37)Career Total W/L76.64% (246-75)
1Clay0
0Titles2
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

I. Peacock vs C. Aussem Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Irene Peacock has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cilly Aussem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Irene Peacock, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cilly Aussem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Irene Peacock has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cilly Aussem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Irene Peacock has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cilly Aussem winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Irene Peacock has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 85% (W/L 29/5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 38/12). Cilly Aussem has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 85% (W/L 222/63), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 23/11).
  • Player level: In the last year, Irene Peacock has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cilly Aussem has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Irene Peacock winning 1 times and Cilly Aussem being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Irene Peacock winning 2 and Cilly Aussem winning 1.
  • The last match between Irene Peacock and Cilly Aussem was at the French Championships, 24-05-1927, Round: , Surface: Clay, with Irene Peacock getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Irene Peacock has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cilly Aussem has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Irene Peacock has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cilly Aussem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Irene Peacock has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cilly Aussem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Irene Peacock vs Cilly Aussem Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

I. Peacock vs C. Aussem H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won1
16Games Won12
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Peacock 0%, Aussem 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Peacock 0%, Aussem 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Peacock 0%, Aussem 0%.

I. Peacock Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassWimbledon - 20-06-1932

R2

GBRM. Heeley
L
6-3 6-1

R1

GBRS. Hewitt
W
6-2 6-2
GrassBeckenham - 06-06-1932

R4

GBRC. Tyrrell
W
6-1 6-3

GBRF. James
L
6-2 6-4

R3

GBRB. Dix
W
8-6 8-6

C. Aussem Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayHamburg - 03-08-1935

R3

N/AU. Player
W
6-1 6-1

R4

GERA. Othberg
W
6-2 6-1

SF

POLJ. Jedrzejowska
W
6-2 6-4

F

DENH. Sperling
L
9-7 6-0

SUI Fehlmann
W
6-0 6-2
banner

I. Peacock vs C. Aussem Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
80.83% (156/37)YTD Win/Loss76.64% (246/75)
77.72% (314/90)Sets Win/Loss74.23% (504/175)
65.57% (2194/1152)Games Win/Loss62.57% (3687/2206)
76.00% (38/12)Clay Win/Loss77.89% (222/63)
69.23% (9/4)Indoor Hard W/L50.00% (1/1)
83.33% (80/16)Grass Win/Loss67.65% (23/11)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
76.19% (16/5)Slam W/L75.93% (41/13)
81% (152/187)Best of 3 Sets Win %79% (238/302)
0% (0/0)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/1)
67% (20/30)Deciding Set Win %62% (42/68)
98% (144/141)1st Set Won, Won Match94% (226/213)
2% (144/3)1st Set Won, Lost Match4% (226/10)
26% (43/11)1st Set Lost, Won Match31% (81/25)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ARGA. Collarini8
ARGM. Kestelboim
W1
1.39
W2
2.72
12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ITAG. Piraino
SUIA. BurdetWC
W1
1.072
W2
6.45
05:35 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
JPNK. Nishikori1
JPNT. Ichikawaq
W1
1.184
W2
4.15
02:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ROUC. Cretuq
ITAF. BondioliLL
W1
1.64
W2
2.1
05:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
JAMB. BicknellLL
AUSR. Hijikata2
W1
3.74
W2
1.22
01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
CANA. Donskiq
ITAF. TabaccoWC
W1
1.42
W2
2.61